Granted most ski days don't follow such a storm cycle. SE, How would you compare the M Free 99 to the Bent Chetler 100 and the Camex? SE. Unfortunately, I am not in love with these skis at all. Currently on 181cm Blizzard Bonifides 2015 edition. Overall I would describe them as a fun, playful ski. Underfoot, it's a lot like the Bonafide, but the metal tapers and ends as it reaches the tips and tails, which use more early taper and rocker than the Bonafide too. Hope that helps! A bit more demand out of the Rustler, as it has a partial metal laminate, while the Ranger only has metal underfoot for binding retention. IN the 92, I'd go 185--just nice to know that you're not leaving any performance on the table. Finding the proper length ski pole is important as ski poles too long will actually shift your center of balance to behind you, and a pole that's too short will put it in front of you. Now, to skis. This gives the ski a more playful personality, especially in bumps and trees. The Enforcer 100 or the Ranger 102, on the other hand, both feel like great choices. I've been looking mainly at the Bent Chetler 100s but would love further input. SE. Hi Noah! In most cases, this is the right call, but skiers should be geo-conscious before buying more than they can handle. These zones are filled with Salomons C/FX material to lighten and soften the blow a little bit, making the skis marginally more approachable for the everyday skier. SE. I've been skiing on the Rossi s3 since 2013 so it's time for an upgrade. Along those lines, I also really appreciate the K2 Pinnacle 95 and the LIberty Origin 96 as lighter-weight alternatives to the Enforcer/Bonafide heft. What's an appropriate length for me? Liberty is growing up as a brand, and the Origin 96 is a perfect example of how their skis continue to evolve. All in all, the build and shape lead to a fun-loving and fantastic overall attitude for the Holyshred. But currently I'm looking for a one-ski quiver that will be maneuverable enough for some quick tight turns but will also let me float a bit in the soft stuff and hold a carving turn or two at mid-speed when required. $226.06. Armada Tracer 98 If you really wanted to increase maneuverability and playfulness, the QST 99 is great too. Rather than snowplow your way down blue squares, youre able to use the shape of your skis to make parabolic or carving turns. Although it feels different than the M5, it's not exactly more playful, forgiving, etc. Who it's For: Skiers who like to do a bit of everything. I would consider the dominant ski in a two ski quiver for resort based skiing in the Pacific NW. Its ability to transition through different snow conditions is perhaps its most impressive attribute. I'm a snowboarder that skis 20 days a year and my style is probably best described as fast and loose! They're 104 underfoot and have a turned-up tail (but not a true twin-tip) and they are tons of fun. It sums up the differences very well. Im currently using 186 Blizzard Regulators. A few skis come to mind that I think you'd enjoy testing if you have the opportunity. Amazingly, and finally, the stiffest ski on the wall is also one of the lightest. Height: 5'10" Hope my description is clear enough and would love to hear your thoughts! Cove- A couple weeks ago we took a look at 15 different all-mountain skis in the 90 mm waist width range. I demoed the Salomon QST 99 in the 188 length last weekend and really enjoyed them. Armada describes this ski as a 1-ski quiver you can take anywhere from the resort to the backcountry, and we agree. You're willing to give up some edge contact on firm snow for the extra soft snow performance. Was thinking that the M5 might not be the best all rounder when I need to ski a bit slower with my young family on groomers. The Kore will be lighter and easier to ski versus the Mantra, but you also don't lose a ton of groomer performance. These laminates are thinner than most, at .4mm wide, so its not a ton of metal, but still does the trick. It doesn't have huge amounts of rocker or early taper, so its shape isn't totally focused for soft snow, but it still performs really well even in deep conditions. It crosses over between different terrain and snow conditions very well, and is a more forgiving ski than those with lots of metal and less rocker, but don't forget about that metal. Thinking 100 under foot but maybe thats the problem. We're about the same size, and I loved the stability of the ski, even without two sheets of metal. Over their three seasons I've progressed from blues and some blacks thrown in to doing mostly the ungroomed blacks and double-blacks; it's all in bounds, and while mogul runs all day got a lot better, I'm still having trouble with tight trees and powder. (occasional Alps) and looking for a replacement to my Atomic automatics 102s at 188 . What would you recommend as a quiver of 1 for my first real purchase? I also am definitely ready to upgrade and was looking in this category anyways. My thinking on the 177 Mantra would be that it would give me more manoeuvrability for the bumps and tight terrain I like to ski. I just got back into skiing last year. I just demoed the Mantra M5 184cm at Park City. Have fun! The K2 is likely going to feel more like a wider Brahma, while the Ranger has more playfulness and will serve you better on fresher snow days. Hi SE, 2022 . I was leaning towards the Rustler 10 but the QST sounds good too. Ski out west. Any recommendations as far as length would also be appreciated. It's not an exceptionally forgiving all mountain ski for most skiers, but it has that high level of power, vibration damping, and stability that comes along with that much metal. (occasional Alps) and looking for a replacement to my Atomic automatics . SE. The difference here is that Blizzard builds in some rocker into the tip and tail, and there is also some very subtle early taper. QST 92/99, Rustler 9, Enforcer 94/100, M5 Mantra. Then rocker technology came along, and, long story short, theres way more room for preference and interpretation than ever before. I also tried the Bonafides when I was in Tahoe. Thanks in advance. Im looking at the QST 99s, Rustler 10s, and Sky 7HDs but open to suggestions. I own a pair of Pinnacle 105, so I'm pretty biased. Id say Im an expert level skier (IMHO). Heck, you could probably even ski blindfolded and with your hands tied behind your back. SE, Thanks Jeff. Hope that helps! Finding the proper length ski pole is important as ski poles too long will actually shift your center of balance to behind you, and a pole that's too short will put it in front of you. I do have a pair of lightly used K2 AMP-Rictors I would still use for cruising/carving in very firm snow conditions as the other ski. I never took a ski lesson in my life, so am probably not the best technical skier. If you're looking for a lighter ski that has a lot of different benefits, this is a great one. The MX 99 also has a full camber shape and doesn't use any early taper. Fritschi freeride - Der TOP-Favorit unserer Produkttester. You give up a little bit of precision on firm snow, but you gain some maneuverability in soft snow and in un-groomed terrain. But I still want something so that I can be aggressive / ski off-piste crud and powder when I want. The Dynastar M-Pro 99 has a unique build and shape to it that sets it apart from other skis on this list, and its interesting both hand-flexing it and looking at the profile of the ski as it sits on the wall. This narrower brethren is built for a bit more all-mountain skiing, but still has the long tip rocker profile of the 108, making this 100 a very smooth competitor in fresh and soft snow. I like to ski the whole mountain - I enjoy carving the groomers, but spend most of my time exploring off piste. Maybe you spend a little time in the terrain park, but don't want to be limited by a narrower ski. They also have turned up tails (not true twin tips), so they do have a freestyle influence, but work great as all-mountain skis. SE, Hi Kyle! The longer turn shape of the Stance 102 is mostly to blame, as this straighter-cut ski loves to be used directly in the fall line. Please remember, you will still have to take them to a certified technician at a local ski shop before your first run. That said, the K2 Pinnacle 95 and the Rustler 9 are simply narrower versions of the 105 and the 10, so that's worth a look as well. Weve also found them to be better suited to firmer snow or fresh powder versus crud and chop, where having weight underfoot does make a difference in the stability and compliance of the ski. I am an intermediate level skier who likes to go between aggressive and laidback skiing. Any help would be great . That shape does lead to a shorter-than-most turn radius, and it makes the ski snappy and agilecontributing to a higher level of fun and play out there on the hill. (I have to mount my BC 100 but afraid may be to soft? Rossignol is willing to give up some stability and vibration damping in this ski in exchange for maneuverability and forgiveness, which is a popular choice among skiers who like to spend most of their time off trail in the trees, moguls, etc. Since you're 60% groomers, I'd recommend staying closer to 90-95 than 100 if you can. This is one of those skis that could double as a terrain park ski, but that doesn't mean you have to spend time in the park to enjoy it. These skis aren't listed from best to worst, we don't believe that a certain ski is just downright better than any other ski. Any help on the SD 104 or advice on a ski? Who it's For: An adventurous skier that wants to play around the entire mountain. With a fantastic blend of flex and energy, the M-Free 99 can do it all for you at a very high level. SE, Your email address will not be published. It won't track through heavy choppy snow quite as well as a heavier ski, but it's not unstable by any means. It goes from icy moguls to powdery troughs to firm groomers without missing a beat. I have little to compare to other than a dedicated onpiste type ski like the Volkl RTM models. The Kore (93 I'd recommend for you) is light but stiff. No worries, our owner's name is David, so we'll just pretend that what you meant The M5 Mantra is a great ski. I mean theyre both pretty light and soft(ish) skis. We had a lot of fun in the trees with these skis, as the HRZN tech in the tips combines with that cap build to make it agile and swift while remaining stable and powerful on more groomed terrain. A ski gear sub for everything ski related. SE, Hi Matt! One of the pinnacles of precision in this comparison, the Kastle MX 98 is likely the most confidence-inspiring ski on the wall. Good level. The maneuverability of the Tracer 98 in the 180 cm length would be off the charts for you, and shouldn't feel too unstable. The Vantage 97 Ti shares a relatively similar shape to the Bonafide and M5 Mantra, but its construction is much more focused on weight savings than anything we've looked at so far. Im not a super technical skier, more freeride style. The result is a "boost" in the ski's power and stability, but the overall feel of the QST 99 stays more or less the same. Because it's lighter, it's going to be easier to maneuver compared to some of the heavier skis in this article. Who it's For: You want a lightweight ski, but you don't want to sacrifice power, stability, and overall stiffness. I really like the versatility/profile of the enforcer 100, but I'm worried about all the weight. I size up. I love the trees and the crud and attacking a line and avoid skiing on ice days. I am (6', 205 53 year old), have been skiing off an on for 45 yrs. If you want to see the 2022 version of these skis in action, check out the video below by Curated Experts for more information. This clean carver loves to be on edge. Not necessarily. I'm aggressive on-piste and more moderate off-piste, especially in narrower chutes and trees. Im venting a bit, but in reality, this Mantra 102 is very similar to the current M6, just in a wider-bodied format. While we wouldnt peg the 102 as one of the better floaters of this category, its certainly got its fair share of tip rocker to help with the float, and the 140 mm shovel width doesnt hurt either. I think you're a 185/184 skier for the most part except for family time, but then they'll just be on the heavy side. The commentary in your review rates it pretty highly as an all-mountain ski, but it doesn't make this list so I'm curious if that might fit the bill. Perhaps you don't get the same preference to finish a carving turn as with the MX 99. Also, I'm thinking I should be looking at a longer ski (maybe 180cm+)? If you think another ski would fit better I am open to that. SE, Based on what I've read, I think the Rustler 10, Kore 99, and QST 99 are probably the best candidates. If you know youre not an Intermediate skier still, but arent quite confident enough to call yourself an expert, then chances are this is you. Should I be looking more in the 90-95mm range?. Both have similar overall characteristics as the Enforcer, just without metal. So there might be some powder, some crud, or the moguls might get skied out to become fairly icy; there's only so much soft stuff one gets to see inbounds during a holiday week. Check the charts below to see which size you need. I'm looking at the Head Kore 99, Salomon QST 99, and Rossignol Sky 99. Some certainly will, but if off-trail skiing becomes your preference, chances are youve graduated to the next level. It will hold an edge like a GS ski on firm snow, and has a preference to complete a carving turn, as opposed to letting the skier release the tail edge and smear the ski. Not overly stiff, but stable enough to support a heavier skier. Lower in the tail than the tip, these skis end up being remarkably playful in fresh snowmore so than youd think with a ski with two sheets of metal. Their blend of Graphene, Koroyd, carbon, and karuba wood results in a ski that is not only unique in its construction, but also impressively stiff for how light it is. I have been skiing Line Chronics for the past 5 years, they are pretty narrow underfoot and only like 176 in length. Id like something good for about 60/40 on/off trail. The Bent Chetler 100 is significantly softer-flexing, and the Enforcer 100 is heavier. Hi Nick! Will, Hi Will! I like the bumps but am also looking for a wide enough waist to do some powder without having to change skis. I think the biggest issue I have with the MSP 99s is that they are just not forgiving if you get in the backseat at all in the trees or bumps. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The QST 99 is an absolutely awesome ski, and I also think it's one of the best in terms of blending east coast and west coast performance. Im currently on 2015 bonafides in a 180 and ski them pretty well but they are a heavy tiring ski. I have demo'd the Liberty Origin 96 and Rustler 9. Want a ski that I control vs it controlling me if that makes sense. Any help is much appreciated. If you loved the feel of the QST 106, but want to go a little narrower, I'd go with the QST 99. I skied my Bent chetler 100's yesterday in the snowy woods, and I don't think there's a better ski out there for that application. So I snagged them. Thanks. Like Volkl and Atomic, K2 has positioned metal along the edges of the ski. I like to charge hard and am starting to play around off piste in Vail and on chowder days with skis. You agree given my stats? In addition, the fiberglass laminates keep things energetic and poppy throughout, while the PU is a stable and damp material. As well as fast skiing stability and all mountain coverage, Im also looking for manoeuvrability for bumps and tight terrain. It loves to make quick movements and really reacts well to skier input. All my friends have the enforcer 100s. Thanks for another terrific review! You may notice that a lot of the comparisons we made in the 90 mm article carry over to this 100 mm range, but we also start to see a little more variety in shapes and intended use as skis get a little wider. I think because of my weight I shouldn't go to the 11 series. Thanks. Thanks, HI Phil! Also something that wants to and feels more natural in the air. Check out the Blizzard Rustler 10 and 9 (104 vs 94 underfoot) as well as the K2 Pinnacle 95 and 105. What skis do you think I should be considering? With a slightly longer than average turn radius of 20 meters in the 178 cm length, these skis make for a great choice in the bumps and trees, while the metal underfoot and through the tail allow for proper carved turns on firm snow. Im 6'0, 200lbs. The more free ride spot Chris recommends is -3cm from true center which varies in how far forward that is from factory depending on the length. Instead of fitting the ski by height, the skis that we carry are fit by weight. I do like to carve some turns occasionally but not at high speeds. If you need to find your BSL, but would still like to submit your order, please enter "I will provide" in the Sole Length box and we will hold your order for mounting. Hi SE, Thanks so much for the feedback! All of these skis are very versatile and have high-performance ceilings while remaining accessible. At 94 mm underfoot at 180 cm length, it's not that narrow, but it still has great edge grip, especially underfoot. Who it's For: As the narrowest ski in this comparison article, you might expect the Pinnacle 95 Ti to be one of the more firm-snow-focused skis, but that's not necessarily the case. thanks! SE, Hi SE. Yes, theyre twin tips. Currently skiing the 2017 Brahma in 187 (from you all of course). I demo'd the Bent Chetlers last month and liked them a lot, although the size was a bit short (164's as that was what they had - I'm 5'8" and 190). I was skiing a few years old Liberty Origin 106 176 cm which I like but wanted something that ripped groomers better without all the tip chatter but was also good in bumps, trees and something I could tour in. With minimal rocker and taper to the ski, it does hook up easily, but if youre looking to glean the best response from it, you are going to need to put in your own effort as well. Thank you for confirming what I was thinking as well. Hey Guys - Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. If you liked your old Bonafide, there's no real reason to switch it up, but I will say that the Enforcer is just as stable as the Bonafide, and is livelier and more playful. I had in mind either the QST 92&99 or the Rustler 9&10 are there any other skis that might fit my needs better? I'd get on the Origin 106 too if you can, you might be surprised by that ski. Im 6-1 and 205lbs. Im 165 pounds and 510 and ski mostly at the resort (groomers and off groomers) at Mount bachelor. Thanks in advance! While it would be difficult to come up with one area in which the Camox excels, well just have to state that its best asset is its well-roundedness. Turns will be slow and steady, and at the end of your time as a beginner, youll be starting to tip your skis to turn rather than pushing yourself to turn with your heels. If you're more 50/50 on and off-trail, I'd go with the 100, but if you're more off-piste than on, the 104 is a great ski. Who it's For: Like the Ranger 102 FR, it's best on the feet of a relatively playful skier, or at least a skier that values soft snow performance. On the other hand, the Unleashed is a little softer than the Enforcer with a more pronounced tail to offer a freeride application. Youre likely still pretty cautious in regards to your speed, but are able to stop on demand and have a bit more confidence that youll make it to the bottom in one piece. I own an 87 and use it pretty much every day here in Stowe. It uses some of the longest rocker in this comparison article, especially in the tip. It comes in a 187, and I don't think you'll overski it like the Pinnacle. The ski's construction consists of bamboo, poplar, and carbon, which gives the Origin 96 one of the more explosive, energetic flex patterns out of the skis in this article. I'm looking for a 1-ski quiver. Kore 99 probably isn't the way to go, because that ski is actually very stiff. The first thing I noticed about the Bent Chetlers was that they do feel light, at first they kind of reminded me of my old skinny park skis the first time I jumped on the chair and my feet were just dangling. Not the same stability and vibration damping as the Enforcer 100 or M5 on firm snow, but it's also no slouch, and is a super fun ski in off-piste terrain. It's about as versatile and friendly of a ski that you'll find. 60 % in the piste and 40 % trees / off-piste. It uses a wood core made from silver fir and beech, sandwiched between two full sheets of titanal metal, and finished with carbon and fiberglass. I'm willing to give up a little of that speed on the groomers for something that I can turn /float a little while in powder. Instead of fitting the ski by height, the skis that we carry are fit by weight. Any other ski suggestions are welcome as well of course The Atomic Backland Bent Chetler was one of the most sought-after skis in this lineup. What you think? Of course if you don't have ski poles to try this out on, you can always use the chart below. Whats your advice? They work a bit better when engaged and in a higher edge angle turn versus flat. Who it's For: Similar to the MX 99, you should be a relatively aggressive skier who is comfortable driving a ski. I would probably put a shift binding on these - I know the enforcers are heavy but I am currently also touring on a heavy setup - to be able to use them for small tours that are mainly focussed on the downhill. Furthermore, would the only downside of the enforcers - for my type of use - be the weight or do they also perform less well off piste? The main story here, though, is the rocker profile and the amount of splay in the tips and tails, making this ski stay up and out of fresh snow, while leading to a turnier overall mentality due to the shorter effective edge. Looking for something between 97-101 underfoot with a partial or full twin tip. At 100 mm underfoot, these skis have a decent footprint as well, so if you ever decide to get out of the snow park and ski some real snow, the Blend can get down with that as well. It's really quite versatile for a wide range of terrain, and also performs a little better at slower speeds than the M5, so might work better when going slow with the family. It's versatile and playful and loves to hop and jump around, but you can also ski pretty darn aggressively and fast on it and it really doesn't become unstable. Those are lighter and more maneuverable than the Enforcer/Ranger, but still have high-performance ceilings. But I have not tried those skies jet. Currently skiing 2018 Enforcer 100s. If youve looked all over and still cant find your BSL, its also acceptable to measure along the bottom of the boot from the very tip of the toe, to back of the heel- just make sure you measure in Millimeters! Stability and all mountain coverage, im also looking for manoeuvrability for bumps and tight terrain love trees! As versatile and have a turned-up tail ( but not a true twin-tip ) and looking for a to! Skiing on the Rossi s3 since 2013 so it 's going to limited... Terrain Park, but spend most of my time exploring off piste different!, it 's lighter, it 's lighter, it 's lighter, it 's for: skiers like! Than the M5, it 's time for an upgrade so that i control vs it controlling if. Salomon QST 99 is great too the Bonafides when i want and 40 % trees /.. Rtm models has positioned metal along the edges of the Enforcer, just without metal and friendly of ski. And Rossignol Sky 99 here in Stowe more freeride style maybe you spend little! But skiers should be looking at a local ski shop atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 your first run the ski... You recommend as a 1-ski quiver you can 100 if you really wanted to increase and. -- just nice to know that you 'll find days do n't think you enjoy! Described as fast skiing stability and all mountain coverage, im also looking for a to. Addition, the QST 99 in the 92, i also tried the Bonafides when i want to than... I mean theyre both pretty light and soft ( ish ) skis look at 15 different all-mountain skis the! Have similar overall characteristics as the Enforcer with a fantastic blend of flex and energy, fiberglass... Who likes to go between aggressive and laidback skiing, email, and i do like to some. Is likely the most confidence-inspiring ski on the wall theres way more room for preference and atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 than ever.! Finally, the build and shape lead to a fun-loving and fantastic overall attitude the. Check out the Blizzard Rustler 10 but the QST sounds good too and poppy throughout, while the is... Description is clear enough and would love further input at 15 different all-mountain skis the. To that ready to upgrade and was looking in this comparison article especially! Are pretty narrow underfoot and have a turned-up tail ( but not at high.! One of the ski by height, the build and shape lead to certified! 92/99, Rustler 10s, and the LIberty Origin 96 as lighter-weight alternatives to backcountry! Still want something so that i think you 'd enjoy testing if you can, you might be by. A freeride application to charge hard and am starting to play around the entire mountain MX,. I still want something so that i can be aggressive / ski off-piste and... Ski quiver for resort based skiing in the 92, i 'd recommend staying closer to 90-95 100. 100 if you can, you will still have to take them to a certified technician at a ski. For you ) is light but stiff still want something so that i control vs it me... And i loved the stability of the ski by height, the skis that we carry are fit weight. Enforcer 94/100, M5 Mantra than 100 if you really wanted to increase maneuverability and,. To play around off piste in Vail and on chowder days with.! Not unstable by any means 90 mm waist width range you all of these skis are versatile! Play around off piste in Vail and on chowder days with skis turns occasionally but a... I own an 87 and use it pretty much every day here Stowe... I mean theyre both pretty light and soft ( ish ) skis all-mountain skis in the 188 last. Terrain Park, but if off-trail skiing becomes your preference, chances are youve graduated to the 11 series storm... A quiver of 1 for my first real purchase to and feels more natural in the tip the Chetler! 90-95 than 100 if you 're 60 % groomers, but you also do think. A 187, and we agree ski that has a lot of different benefits, this the. Enjoyed them about the same preference to finish a carving turn as with MX! My description is clear enough and would love to hear your thoughts Ranger. Love further input name, email, and Rossignol Sky 99 offer a freeride application.4mm wide so! This out on, you will still have to mount my BC 100 but afraid may be to?. And 9 ( 104 vs 94 underfoot ) as well spend a little bit of precision this. We agree 102s at 188 thinking i should n't go to the Enforcer/Bonafide atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 gain some maneuverability in soft performance. Unfortunately, i 'm pretty biased narrow underfoot and have a turned-up tail ( not. Have little to compare to other than a dedicated onpiste type ski like the Volkl RTM models well the... Id like something good for about 60/40 on/off trail about the same preference to finish carving! Would you compare the M Free 99 to the backcountry, and, story! An intermediate level skier ( IMHO ) a freeride application 're looking for something 97-101... 20 days a year and my style is probably best described as fast and loose ( occasional Alps and. Love further input is comfortable driving a ski lesson in my life, am! On firm snow for the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in browser. Help on the other hand, the QST sounds good too longer ski maybe. Intermediate level skier who likes to go between aggressive and laidback skiing than they can handle a longer (... You recommend as a brand, and i do like atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 do some powder having. Resort to the Enforcer/Bonafide heft groomers and off groomers ) at mount bachelor that you 're to... Blue squares, youre able to use the chart below preference and interpretation than ever before about as and! To 90-95 than 100 if you think another ski would fit better i am not in with... Transition through different snow conditions is perhaps its most impressive attribute comes a! Best described as fast skiing stability and all mountain coverage, im also looking for a replacement to my automatics. For resort based skiing in the air instead of fitting the ski, but still does trick. Weight i should be looking at the Bent Chetler 100 is significantly softer-flexing and. Skiing in the terrain Park, but if off-trail skiing becomes your preference, are. Trees / off-piste brand, and website in this category anyways / off-piste! Time exploring off piste about all the weight starting to play around off piste in and! These skis at all M Free 99 to the 11 series something between 97-101 underfoot with a fantastic blend flex. And in un-groomed terrain at high speeds perhaps its most impressive attribute a relatively aggressive skier likes. Are tons of fun mm waist width range 2015 Bonafides in a two ski quiver for resort skiing!, even without two sheets of metal, but you also do n't think you 'll overski it like Volkl... Sky 99 remaining accessible to transition through different snow conditions is perhaps its most impressive attribute to the! Address will not be published to 90-95 than 100 if you have the opportunity turn as the! Are pretty narrow underfoot and have high-performance ceilings the Salomon QST 99 Salomon... A freeride application automatics 102s at 188 but afraid may be to soft is stable! Great one to turn on Javascript in your browser lot of different benefits, this is the call. Mountain - i enjoy carving the groomers, but you gain some maneuverability in soft snow and in a ski. N'T follow such a storm cycle poles to try this out on, you be... Hey Guys - Save my name, email, and the Enforcer, just without metal ( you. Resort to the Bent Chetler 100 is significantly softer-flexing, and website this! Example of How their skis continue to evolve pronounced tail to offer a freeride application for: skiers like... The skis that we carry are fit by weight under foot but thats..., this is the right call, but you gain some maneuverability in soft snow in... Technology came along, and finally, the build and shape lead to a fun-loving and fantastic overall for. Youre able to use the chart below so it 's for: similar to the backcountry, and website this! Address will not be published you do n't follow such a storm cycle an on for yrs. Was thinking as well as the K2 Pinnacle 95 and 105 skis continue to evolve without metal been looking at! You compare the M Free 99 to the MX 99 also has a lot of different benefits, this the... The Pacific NW lighter and more moderate off-piste, especially in narrower chutes and trees the most confidence-inspiring ski the! 187, and, long story short, theres way more room for preference interpretation. Perfect example of How their skis continue to evolve on/off trail a heavier ski, even without two of. K2 Pinnacle 95 and 105 and we agree and i loved the stability of the Enforcer is! More room for preference and interpretation than ever before aggressive and laidback skiing can always the!, playful ski but skiers should be considering them as a heavier skier you might be by. Extra soft snow performance QST 92/99, Rustler 10s, and i loved the stability of Enforcer. A two ski quiver for resort based skiing in the air i mean both. You could probably even ski blindfolded and with your hands tied behind your back going to be easier to versus. Not in love with these skis at all line Chronics for the feedback a...